Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Vigne's avatar

What I have noticed in the US is the tendency for medical professionals to work in silos. I have/had relatives here who are prescribed a huge amount of medications with, it seems, little thought of contraindications. Don't get me wrong, European medicine is not perfect either, but they are not as prescription-happy. I understand that specialists are reluctant to trespass on each other's territory and in my more cynical moments, I think it also gives them a get out, a type of distributed responsibility. Yet it seems to me (and you case looks like an exemplar of this point), that this is precisely where there should be a multi-disciplinary interface. This would not only benefit you, but their own professional development. I find it bizarre (as a curious engineer) that many of the medical professionals I have met in various situations, often tend to lack an interest in the wider context of a person's medical condition. In part that is about keeping a professional distance and staying sane but there is a balance to be struck. I hesitate to make a suggestion, but would it be possible for you to somehow float the idea that they have some kind of multi-disciplined virtual conference on your case? I dare say insurance would not pay for it but perhaps there are other incentives, such as publication opportunities that you could emphasise. You could point out that in the future this type of approach is inevitable and you could perhaps ask whether they would like to be remembered as a pioneer or a nay-sayer. To be frank I think this disconnected approach should not be simply accepted.

Expand full comment
Glen Thomson's avatar

I don’t know what to say that will encourage you, but your description of the complexity of your situation is itself encouraging to me. And that you can find hope in nature, doing art and being with friends. Thank-you for your writing!

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts